Anonymity is still negative?
For several days we open the blog in writing to the users who prefer to remain completely anonymous (and for us, both with respect to the other readers).
We have all the knowledge that no longer had a completely private space. We need examples? The gradual elimination of the currency and the actual transition to electronic forms of payment. The phones that make it traceable and tolls on the road. Telephone conversations. The ubiquitous cameras. The databases with the most diverse in our account, from web browsing preferences on purchases; the garbage, that (hopefully) will ultradifferenziata everywhere for environmental reasons, but, unfortunately, will also be inspected to check and with it our privacy. Up to forms previously unthinkable: the human genome genotyping now privately for a few hundred dollars to search for pathological predisposition, drug response and ancestry (on "23andMe" +5 $ per month for privacy) is seen to be liberalized as Harvard fully in a project by the high nobility of purpose in the immense ethical implications: The Personal Genome Project of the great George Church. The motto is: "Who goes around hiding his face?"
In a world where one is forced to run barefoot, the value "anonymous" earns a positive connotation?
0 comments:
Post a Comment